美利体育登录入口官网

位置:首页 >化学 >化学(综合) >ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH >Dissecting the Mechanism of Biosynthesis of Sulfurated Biomolecules: The Case of tRNA Sulfuration

美利体育登录入口官网:揭示含硫生物分子生物合成机制:以tRNA硫化作用为例

Dissecting the Mechanism of Biosynthesis of Sulfurated Biomolecules: The Case of tRNA Sulfuration

作者:Sylvain Gervason;Marc Fontecave;Béatrice Golinelli-Pimpaneau;

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00485

发表时间:2025年

  • 文献详情
  • 相似文献

美利体育登录入口官网:摘要

点击复制章节链接章节链接已复制!概述生物分子的硫化作用是一种关键的生化过程,负责生成必需的有机辅因子、辅酶、维生素和其他硫化生物分子。特别是tRNA中的硫修饰核苷酸在确保遗传翻译的准确性和效率方面起着关键作用。尽管自2000年代初以来,硫化酶在结构和生化层面已被研究,但详细的机制分析仍十分有限。特别是,催化实验中使用的还原剂的重要性常常被低估。 近年来,厌氧条件的使用促使人们在许多这些酶中发现了一种对催化至关重要的空气敏感的铁-硫簇。这导致提出了一种涉及[4Fe-5S]中间体的催化机制,与此前接受的硫代硫酸盐依赖途径不同。由于这一话题仍有争议,目前对两种机制的理解以及还原剂的作用值得重新评估。 反应所需的硫原子通常由半胱氨酸脱硫酶(CD)从半胱氨酸中提。缓笞魑蛟幢涣蚧甘褂,如全文中E所指出的。根据催化中心,两种主要的E类被区分出来:1. I类E使用一个关键的半胱氨酸残基形成硫代硫酸盐中间体。脱质子化(pKa 6.2)后,亲核的硫代硫酸盐攻击底物上的活化羰基,形成二硫(S-S)中间体。为了再生活性半胱氨酸形式并实现多次周转,需要一个双电子还原系统。体外实验通常使用二硫苏糖醇(DTT)作为还原剂。然而,DTT可能过早将硫代硫酸盐还原为游离的硫氢化物(HS-),后者本身可与底物反应,使解释复杂化。因此,含DTT的实验可能反映的是硫化物依赖而非真正的硫代硫酸盐依赖催化。2. II类E含有一个具有自由配位位点的[4Fe-4S]簇,可结合硫供体(如硫代硫酸盐)形成含二硫键的铁-硫中间体。同样需要双电子还原系统将二硫键还原,生成能够将硫转移到底物并支持多次周转的活性[4Fe-5S]物种。硫代羧酸盐是另一种硫供体,其形成同样需要双电子还原系统。没有还原剂时,仅能实现一次周转。体外实验中,硫化钠可通过直接形成[4Fe-5S]催化中间体作为硫源。 总体而言,两种E类都严重依赖双电子还原系统来维持催化循环。还原剂的存在与否强烈影响酶活性和机制,因此体外实验结果,特别是使用非生理还原剂(如DTT)的实验,应谨慎解释。理解基本的化学原理……


美利体育登录入口官网:Abstract

AbstractClick to copy section linkSection link copied!ConspectusSulfuration of biomolecules is a crucial biochemical process responsible for producing essential organic cofactors, coenzymes, vitamins, and other sulfurated biomolecules. In particular, thiomodified nucleosides in tRNA play a key role in ensuring the accuracy and efficiency of genetic translation. Although sulfurating enzymes have been studied structurally and biochemically since the early 2000s, detailed mechanistic analyses remain limited. In particular, the importance of reductants used in catalytic assays is often underappreciated.In recent years, the use of anaerobic conditions has led to the discovery, in many of these enzymes, of an air-sensitive iron–sulfur cluster that is essential for catalysis. This led to the proposal of a catalytic mechanism involving a [4Fe–5S] intermediate, distinct from the previously accepted persulfide-based pathway. As this remains a debated topic, the current understanding of both mechanisms and the role of reductants warrants a critical evaluation.The sulfur atom for the reaction is usually extracted from cysteine by a cysteine desulfurase (CD) and then used as the sulfur source by sulfurating enzymes, as noted by E throughout the article. Two main E classes are distinguished by their catalytic centers:1.Class I Es use a key cysteinyl residue to form a persulfide intermediate. After deprotonation (pKa 6.2), the nucleophilic persulfide attacks the activated carbonyl group on the substrate, to form a disulfide (S–S) intermediate. To regenerate the active cysteinyl form and permit multiple turnovers, a two-electron reducing system is required. In vitro assays often use dithiothreitol (DTT) as the reductant. However, DTT can prematurely reduce persulfides into free hydrosulfide (HS–) that can itself react with substrates, complicating interpretation. Thus, DTT-containing assays may reflect sulfide-dependent rather than genuine persulfide-dependent catalysis.2.Class II Es contain a [4Fe–4S] cluster with a free coordination site that can bind sulfur donors such as persulfides to form a disulfide-containing iron–sulfur intermediate. A two-electron reducing system is again necessary to reduce the disulfide bond and generate a reactive [4Fe–5S] species capable of transferring sulfur to the substrate and supporting multiple turnovers. Thiocarboxylates are alternative sulfur donors that likewise require a two-electron reducing system for their formation. Without reductants, only one turnover is possible. In vitro, sodium sulfide can serve as a sulfur source by directly forming the [4Fe–5S] catalytic intermediate.Overall, both E classes critically depend on two-electron reducing systems to sustain catalytic cycling. The presence or absence of reductants strongly influences enzyme activity and mechanisms, so that in vitro results, especially those using nonphysiological reductants like DTT, should be interpreted with caution.Understanding the fundamental chemistry of Es is essential not only for elucidating their role in metabolism and cellular regulation but also for potential therapeutic targeting and biotechnological applications. A key remaining challenge is the identification of physiological reducing systems, a critical yet unresolved aspect of sulfuration biochemistry.ACS PublicationsCopyright ? 2025 American Chemical SocietySubjectswhat are subjects Article subjects are automatically applied from the ACS Subject Taxonomy and describe the scientific concepts and themes of the article. Bacteria Biosynthesis Cluster chemistry Peptides and proteins Sulfur


美利体育(meili)官方网站_美利体育手机版下载